City Council
| Jason Grimm | Mayor |
| Steve Rauenhorst | City Council |
| Jamie Davis | City Council |
| Rob Bell | City Council |
| Jay Bunting | City Council |
| 12/22/09 Minutes |
|
|
|
| 2009 Agendas and Minutes |
|
1. Call to Order. The regular meeting of the Council of the City of Rogers was called to order by Mayor Grimm on Tuesday, December 22, 2009 at 7:00 p.m. at Rogers Community Center, 21201 Memorial Drive, Rogers, MN, 55374. Council present: Rob Bell, Jay Bunting, Jamie Davis, Jason Grimm, and Steve Rauenhorst. Staff present: Jeff Carson, City Attorney; Stacy Doboszenski, Assistant City Administrator; Brad Feist, Fire Chief; Jeff Luther, Police Chief; John Seifert, Public Works Supt.; Steve Stahmer, City Administrator; Lisa Wieland, Finance Director; and Bret Weiss, City Engineer. 2. Open Forum. 3. Presentations. Davis questioned if we have ever failed a compliance check. In his seven years, he hasn’t seen a failure. Buysse stated no, he has very good staff and has not failed a check. Motion by Rauenhorst, seconded by Davis to approve the award to Jeremy Miller. Motion carried 5-0. 4. Approve agenda. 5. Consent Agenda. Motion by Rauenhorst, seconded by Bunting, to approve the Consent Agenda, less 5.11. Motion carried 5-0. 5.11 Daytime Response Policy Motion by Bell, seconded by Bunting to approve 5.11. Motion carried 5-0. 6. Public Hearings 7. General Business Council did not have questions regarding the proposed changes. Bunting questioned the amount of sick time employees are able to accrue and the pay-out upon severance and stated in future years he would like to see it go away. Doboszenski explained the City does not cover employees for short-term or long-term disability and the sick time benefit is in lieu of disability insurance. Bunting asked staff to re-examine the cost of disability insurance and stated that he would like to see the sick time policy revised or phased-out. Stahmer stated other cities have similar policies and pay-outs, and some cities may cap a pay-out at something less than 50%. Wieland explained the limit in her past experience being higher than what is in Rogers. Motion by Bunting, seconded by Rauenhorst to adopt the revised personnel policy as presented. Motion carried 5-0. Davis stated the allowance should be tied to the location Council discussed replacing bullet point #2 under the “Allowance” section and replace with language that addresses the city traveled to, according to the GSA website. This change would also reflect a change in bullet point #7 for out-state travel. Motion by Bunting, seconded by Rauenhorst, to adopt the travel policy with the noted changes to “Allowance” section numbers 2 and 7. Bell pointed out a typo; personnel instead of personal on page one. Motion carried 5-0. Motion by Bunting, seconded by Grimm to accept the Planning Commission recommendation for a five year sunset Interim Use Permit with the current upcast lighting. Rauenhorst, stated because it is not compliant with the zoning code, and prior council recommended removing it along with the Planning Commission, he does not support keeping the billboard. Bell stated without the downcast lighting he cannot support it. Bell stated when the City has opportunities to apply standards, and down-cast lighting is best practice, he thinks it needs to have it. Bunting stated he is more in favor of granting a five year Interim Use Permit because of the poor economy and the affect on the businesses in town. Stahmer stated that after checking with MNDOT there are no regulations regarding down-cast lighting. Mike Noto, Planning Commission Chair addressed the council. Noto updated the Council with the discussion held at the Planning Commission; down-cast lighting, taking down the billboard, and the spirit of the sign ordinance. Rauenhorst stated the spirit of the prior council was to remove it. Noto addressed the economy. Rauenhorst stated that is not a good enough argument. Bunting stated, as a business man, it is a good enough argument. This is a band-aid; a 5 year plan. Noto stated he was not involved in the 2004 discussion, but does think it should be allowed, not proliferating the billboard issue by allowing it to stay. Motion failed 3-2; Grimm and Bunting voted aye; Davis, Bell, and Bunting voted no. Attorney Carson stated a resolution of denial will be brought back based on the discussion. Bunting asked if staff would bring back the amount of tax revenue lost due to the billboard being removed. Stahmer stated, if the council so directs. Grimm stated, so directed. Bell wanted to bring the item back up for discussion to propose a motion to include down-cast lighting. Attorney Carson stated a prevailing voting member can bring the item back on the table for discussion. Motion by Bell, seconded by Bunting to bring the item back on the table for discussion. Motion by Bell, seconded by Bunting to allow the interim use with condition #3 for down-cast lighting. Sabot, asked if the lights were turned off all together, would that be allowed. Bell stated that works for him. Motion carries 3-2 with Bell, Bunting, and Grimm voting aye; Davis and Rauenhorst voting no. Weiss stated the bids for the fly-over project came in very good and reduced the city’s obligation from $1.6 to just over $700,000. Weiss stated, not that we need to spend those dollars right away, but it does become a safety issue to move it away from 101; safety issue related to the development along Rogers Drive and maintenance of the utilities. Motion by Rauenhorst, seconded by Bunting to bury the lines and designate the funding source as TIF one. Motion carried 5-0. 8. Other Business. There was a discussion on the number of billboards and the revenue generated from the billboards being used to pay down the debt incurred when assisting in the construction of the high school. Wieland stated the tower and billboard lease fund is over $700,000 in the hole. Grimm stated we are 20 years away from paying that off; Wieland stated 13 years. Bell asked for Council consensus for upcoming lease renewals, to have the staff ask the question of down-cast lighting. Council stated they don’t mind the question being asked. 9. Correspondence and Reports 10. Adjourn Respectfully submitted, |



